On the historic day of inauguration, i was at all of the festivities, but last night i checked out how the varying news programs chose to cover the event. CSPAN used the phrase "the start of the Obama legacy" and "the end of the Bush era" a lot and definitely placed Obama in a very good light. I looked at CBS too
...okay so my internet just shut off after i wrote about a page on this thing. and it didnt auto save. i hate the gwireless web thing. wow this is so frustrating....ugh. i will just quickly summarize the rest of what i said
Basically the CSPAN coverage was mostly hard hitting journalism. It was a lot of facts and focussed a lot on the historic-ness [maybe not a word...] of the event. They talked a lot about the way that previous presidents dealt with inauguration and gave a lot of trivial information about like the longest inaugural speeches and the shortest ones. They talked about how each of the inaugural events began- the parade, the balls, and things like that.
The CBS coverage was basically the complete opposite of this- they talked about little things like family moving into the white house and what they were wearing and how they were going to alter their lifestlyes to acclamate to the environment of the white house.
The reason that CBS did the coverage like this is because this is what the american people care about for this election- people feel so close to Obama and feel like this is a personal victory as well as a victory for Obama. People love to hear about things like the dog that the family is getting and the schools that the girls are going to.
I think that when it comes to the paper, i might talk about how the fact that most people prefer the way that CBS covered the inauguration shows the progression of Americas taste and the way that they see and hear the news. I dont know, these are just some basic ideas so hopefully i can get some more in discussion today.
